Arlificial Bone Substitutes

RECEP MEMİK, Abdurrahman Kutlu, Necmettin Reis

  • Year : 1989
  • Vol : 5
  • No : 4
  •  Page : 298-300
Clinical experience has showrt that autograft and allograft bone work well to aid fracture healing and to fili bony gaps. Despite wiode spread use current bone grajting has important drawbacks. The authors adress varioıa lypes of synthetic materials as artificial bone substitutes with great promise.
Cite this Article As :
Description : None of the authors, any product mentioned in this article, does not have a material interest in the device or drug. Research, not supported by any external organization. grant full access to the primary data and, if requested by the magazine they agree to allow the examination of data.
Arlificial Bone Substitutes
, Vol. 5 (4)
Received : 19.11.1989, Accepted : 19.11.1989, Published Online : 19.11.2020
Selçuk Tıp Dergisi
ISSN:1017-6616;
E-ISSN:2149-8059;
  • article icon Araştırma Makalesi
  • pdf icon View as PDF
  •   keyword icon Keywords Arlificial Bone Substitutes